Neruda Archives

Authority record

Bovet Père & Fils

A reviewed historical business authority linking Bovet Père & Fils to 3 letters in the Absinthe collection, 1811–1820.

Type
Organization
Record status
Reviewed
Archive evidence
3 letters
Local identifier
business-bovet-pere-fils

Identity and scope

The historical business represented by this record

Neuchâtel commercial house documented in three signed letters concerning remittances, bills of exchange, shipments and extract.1

Editorial boundary. It is retained separately from the later Bovet et Lerch commission house. The present evidence does not establish full names of the partners; legal continuity before 1811 and after 1820.

Documentary names

Names preserved in the evidence

Forms are ordered by their earliest dated appearance in the archive. The preferred name supports navigation; historical spellings and abbreviations remain searchable and are never silently replaced.

Name formUseEvidence
Bovet Père & FilsPreferred name; form recorded in the correspondence3 letters, 1811–1820

Documented connections

People, places and correspondence

Pernod Filscorrespondent in the collection

3 letters · 1811-04-21–1820-03-21

Neuchâtel, Switzerlandplace of correspondence

3 letters

Evidence in Neruda Archives

Letters connected with this identity

Every link opens the stable public record with manuscript images, transcription, translation and metadata.

  2. NRA-L-000089 · 1811-04-25

    Letter from Bovet Père & Fils to Pernod fils concerning extract and remittances, April 25, 1811

    Sender as recorded: Bovet Père & Fils

  3. NRA-L-000098 · 1820-03-21

    Letter from Bovet Père & Fils to Pernod fils concerning remittances, March 21, 1820

    Sender as recorded: Bovet Père & Fils

Sources

Evidence used for this authority

  1. NRA-L-000089: signed Bovet Père & Fils letter from NeuchâtelNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
How this identity was established

The linked mentions were joined only after documentary name forms, place, role, date range and surviving business evidence were reviewed together. The local Neruda Archives authority remains primary; a brand, business lineage, historical firm and modern company are not treated as identical without exact supporting evidence.

Future corrections are recorded as new, sourced decisions rather than silently overwriting earlier evidence.