Neruda Archives

Authority record

E. Andouard

A reviewed historical business authority linking E. Andouard to 3 letters in the Absinthe collection, 1891–1892.

Type
Organization
Record status
Reviewed
Archive evidence
3 letters
Local identifier
business-e-andouard-bordeaux

The historical business represented by this record

Bordeaux commercial correspondent documented by three signed order postcards, one of which bears an E. Andouard business stamp.1, 2, 3

Editorial boundary. It is modelled as a commercial identity because the current evidence does not safely distinguish a sole trader from a firm represented by a named signatory. The present evidence does not establish complete personal name represented by the initial E.; business address, trade and legal form; whether the commercial identity and the signatory should later receive separate authority records.

Names preserved in the evidence

Forms are ordered by their earliest dated appearance in the archive. The preferred name supports navigation; historical spellings and abbreviations remain searchable and are never silently replaced.

Name formUseEvidence
E. AndouardPreferred name; form recorded in the correspondence3 letters, 1891–1892

People, places and correspondence

Pernod Filscorrespondent in the collection

3 letters · 1891-10-23–1892-01-21

Bordeaux, Franceplace of correspondence

3 letters

Letters connected with this identity

Every link opens the stable public record with manuscript images, transcription, translation and metadata.

Evidence used for this authority

  1. NRA-L-000174: postcard signed by E. Andouard at BordeauxNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
  2. NRA-L-000220: E. Andouard commercial order from BordeauxNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
  3. NRA-L-000343: E. Andouard postcard bearing a Bordeaux commercial stampNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
How this identity was established

The linked mentions were joined only after documentary name forms, place, role, date range and surviving business evidence were reviewed together. The local Neruda Archives authority remains primary; a brand, business lineage, historical firm and modern company are not treated as identical without exact supporting evidence.

Future corrections are recorded as new, sourced decisions rather than silently overwriting earlier evidence.