Neruda Archives

Authority record

Henri Faivre

A reviewed historical business authority linking Henri Faivre to 5 letters in the Absinthe collection, 1898–1904.

Type
Organization
Record status
Reviewed
Archive evidence
5 letters
Local identifier
business-henri-faivre-montbeliard

The historical business represented by this record

Commercial correspondent at Montbéliard documented by repeated printed and stamped cards under the name Henri Faivre.1, 2

Editorial boundary. The authority represents the business identity visible in the correspondence and does not claim a complete personal biography. The present evidence does not establish full legal form and street address of the Montbéliard business; whether every historical reference to Faivre of Montbéliard denotes this same establishment.

Names preserved in the evidence

Forms are ordered by their earliest dated appearance in the archive. The preferred name supports navigation; historical spellings and abbreviations remain searchable and are never silently replaced.

Name formUseEvidence
Henri FaivrePreferred name; form recorded in the correspondence5 letters, 1898–1904

People, places and correspondence

Pernod Filscorrespondent in the collection

5 letters · 1898-10-18–1904-09-06

Montbéliard, Franceplace of correspondence

5 letters

Letters connected with this identity

Every link opens the stable public record with manuscript images, transcription, translation and metadata.

  1. NRA-L-000193 · 1901-03-05

    Postcard from Henri Faivre to Pernod Fils ordering four cases of absinthe, March 5, 1901

    Sender as recorded: Henri Faivre

Evidence used for this authority

  1. L'absinthe: dictionnaire des marques, volume 3, D-E-FCatalogue collectif de France, Bibliothèque nationale de France · 2026-08-27
  2. NRA-L-000190: Henri Faivre postcard with Montbéliard commercial stampNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
How this identity was established

The linked mentions were joined only after documentary name forms, place, role, date range and surviving business evidence were reviewed together. The local Neruda Archives authority remains primary; a brand, business lineage, historical firm and modern company are not treated as identical without exact supporting evidence.

Future corrections are recorded as new, sourced decisions rather than silently overwriting earlier evidence.