Identity and scope
The historical business represented by this record
Commercial correspondent at Saverne documented by three signed order postcards naming Café Claude.1, 2, 3
Editorial boundary. The authority preserves the combined documentary identity and does not infer Hildebrand's given name or the café's legal ownership. The present evidence does not establish hildebrand's complete personal identity; street address and legal ownership of Café Claude.
Documentary names
Names preserved in the evidence
Forms are ordered by their earliest dated appearance in the archive. The preferred name supports navigation; historical spellings and abbreviations remain searchable and are never silently replaced.
| Name form | Use | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Hildebrand, Café Claude | Preferred name; form recorded in the correspondence | 3 letters, 1891–1896 |
Documented connections
People, places and correspondence
3 letters · 1891-11-19–1896-06-01
3 letters
Evidence in Neruda Archives
Letters connected with this identity
Every link opens the stable public record with manuscript images, transcription, translation and metadata.
NRA-L-000170 · 1891-11-19
Postcard from Hildebrand of Café Claude to Pernod Fils ordering thirty to thirty-five litres of absinthe, November 19, 1891
Sender as recorded: Hildebrand, Café Claude
NRA-L-000168 · 1895-04-12
Postcard from Hildebrand of Café Claude to Pernod Fils ordering a barrel of absinthe, April 12, 1895
Sender as recorded: Hildebrand, Café Claude
NRA-L-000164 · 1896-06-01
Postcard from Hildebrand of Café Claude to Pernod Fils ordering a barrel of absinthe, June 1, 1896
Sender as recorded: Hildebrand, Café Claude
Sources
Evidence used for this authority
- NRA-L-000164: Hildebrand postcard signed for Café Claude at SaverneNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
- NRA-L-000168: Hildebrand postcard for Café Claude at SaverneNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
- NRA-L-000170: Hildebrand postcard for Café Claude at SaverneNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
How this identity was established
The linked mentions were joined only after documentary name forms, place, role, date range and surviving business evidence were reviewed together. The local Neruda Archives authority remains primary; a brand, business lineage, historical firm and modern company are not treated as identical without exact supporting evidence.
Future corrections are recorded as new, sourced decisions rather than silently overwriting earlier evidence.