Neruda Archives

Authority record

E. Jurie

A reviewed correspondent authority linking E. Jurie to 3 letters in the Absinthe collection, 1896.

Type
Person
Record status
Reviewed
Archive evidence
3 letters
Local identifier
person-e-jurie

The correspondent represented by this record

Agent named on the printed Bordeaux office card of the General Steam Navigation Company. Three 1896 postcards share the same name, place, recipient, commercial function and hand/signature context.1, 2, 3

Editorial boundary. The present evidence does not establish expansion of the initial E.; birth and death dates.

Names preserved in the evidence

Forms are ordered by their earliest dated appearance in the archive. The preferred name supports navigation; historical spellings and abbreviations remain searchable and are never silently replaced.

Name formUseEvidence
E. JuriePreferred name; form recorded in the correspondence1 letter, 1896
E. Jurie, General Steam Navigation Co.Form recorded in the correspondence2 letters, 1896

People, places and correspondence

1896–1896 · confirmed

Pernod Filscorrespondent in the collection

3 letters · 1896-07-30–1896-10-12

Bordeaux, Franceplace of correspondence

3 letters

Letters connected with this identity

Every link opens the stable public record with manuscript images, transcription, translation and metadata.

  1. NRA-L-000171 · 1896-10-12

    Postcard from E. Jurie of the General Steam Navigation Co. to Pernod Fils acknowledging a cheque for 68.37 francs, October 12, 1896

    Sender as recorded: E. Jurie, General Steam Navigation Co.

Evidence used for this authority

  1. NRA-L-000171: General Steam Navigation Company Bordeaux office card naming agent E. JurieNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
  2. NRA-L-000289: E. Jurie postcard concerning bonded merchandiseNeruda Archives · 2026-08-27
  3. NRA-L-000345: E. Jurie postcard concerning a consignment for A. Smyth & Co.Neruda Archives · 2026-08-27
How this identity was established

The linked mentions were joined only after name, place, role, date and correspondence network were reviewed together. The local Neruda Archives record remains primary, and incomplete initials are not silently expanded.

Future corrections are recorded as new, sourced decisions rather than silently overwriting earlier evidence.